Episode 313 – Eye of the Storm

Episode 313 Header

You’ll notice as you read this blog that I don’t have a lot to say about what actually happens in the episode. I predicted most of it last week, and while I liked the execution of many of the details, when I compare this week’s episode to last week’s, it just comes up short. Most of what I talk about in this blog are the things I think were missing.

I really, really hope that next season is better balanced in terms of assigning material from the book to each episode. Because I felt like this one was just ticking the boxes that needed to be ticked to finish Voyager and wrap up the season. I didn’t feel engaged by much of the story, even the parts I liked (John and Jamie, Yi Tien Cho and Margaret, some of the interactions between Jamie and Claire).

And, honestly, if I hadn’t already read the books, I wouldn’t feel any particular need to move on to the next season. They’ve wrapped everything up with a nice bow and here we are in the new world. This could easily be a series finale rather than a season finale. But getting back to the episode…

The title card seems to be foreshadowing the storm and Claire being dragged off the ship with a broken leg, but it’s curious to me that they’re showing that. In the talkback at the end of the episode, they said they were trying to set it up the same was as the premiere, but in the premiere, we kept coming back to Jamie on the battlefield, and the rest of the story was told via flashback until things moved forward. This was a time jump—starting at the end and then jumping back in time, to then later catch up to the opening scene. So if they were going for parallel structure, they missed the mark.

I do like the bit with Fergus and Marsali. It’s fantastic that she’s asserting herself in their relationship, and Fergus isn’t beating his chest and telling her no. And he’s no less masculine or manly for allowing his wife to be his equal. It’s really lovely to see.

Damn, I love Lord John. And yeah, things happen pretty much exactly as I said last week. John is never going to let any harm come to Jamie as long as he has the power to stop it. And damn, does he know how to throw his weight around. My heart fluttered as Jamie walked away. David Berry is killing it. All of my other complaints aside, they did a great job of casting this season.

Geillis is super nuts, y’all. And it’s odd to me that Claire used Brianna as proof. Why not just tell Geillis about seeing her at the stones in 1968? Or talk about Greg Edgars? Claire couldn’t have known those things if she wasn’t there, so that should be proof enough that she traveled. I mean, yeah, it’s in the moment and all that, but Geillis is off-her-rocker crazy. Wouldn’t Claire’s instinct be to protect Brianna at all costs? It was her instinct in the book, as I recall—Geillis found the pictures in Jamie’s pocket. “Because it needed to happen for the story/conflict” is not a good reason.

But we’ll just have to go with it. And the rest of the plot pieces come together, as predicted, with Margaret and Yi Tien Cho. I hope they make it to Martinique, and that she’s not too scarred about what happened to her brother, asshole though he was.

UGH to the voice over! It was so intrusive into the scene and threw me right out of the story. It drained every last bit of tension away. We all get it. The pool is the portal. It was clear from the moment they entered. And everything else in the scene made it clear, too. Stating it just made me start thinking and stop feeling—the exact opposite of what you want the audience to do in a moment like this.

And wow, they did not need to keep coming back to the shot of Geillis with her head partially severed from her neck, and the blood spurting. Ugh. Gross.

I did like Claire’s shock, and Jamie pulling her and Young Ian close. That was nice.

But of course, they get back onto a ship. And my first thought is that we just very volubly stated that Jamie could be taken—if he were at sea. (Spoilers: nothing comes of that. Inexplicably.)

I’m very distracted by the soap on Jamie’s face in this love scene. I know, nitpicky details. But soap tastes disgusting, and would be worse in this era—even if it’s expensive soap. There’s no way some of that isn’t going into Claire’s (Caitriona’s) mouth. Ah, finally wiping it off.

As much as I’m all for love scenes with Jamie and Claire—and this one’s dialogue was taken straight from the book—I hate to say it, but this is gratuitous sex. I’ve written a number of blog posts on sex scenes and romance, and the rule about sex is the same as the rule for any scene. If the scene isn’t pushing the plot forward or doing some other story duty (character development, raising stakes, creating conflict, etc.), it should be cut. And that scene should have been cut, because nothing happens except sex.

Or, rather, the scene should have been rewritten so that it acted as a way for Claire and Jamie to reconnect after everything that has just happened. If they’d had Jamie work through Claire’s trauma after killing Geillis, bringing her back with touch and love, this scene could have been amazing. Instead, it feels jarring. Here we are, after everything that has happened, and we’re getting this tongue-in-cheek, teasing, everyone’s happy and hunky-dory love scene. What??

And what about Young Ian? He was raped by Geillis. At least in the book, there was fallout from that act. Gabaldon dealt with it. She didn’t forget about it, or think we’d forget about it. I’m not thrilled with how it all worked out in the book, but she didn’t shy away from it, either. I don’t understand why they didn’t just cut that entirely. They are basically treating it as though it wasn’t a rape at all—which it entirely, 100%, was. And so was what happened to Fergus last season, but they dropped the ball on that one, too. What is up with that?

And then we’re tossed right into a storm. But there’s no sense that any of their actions are driving things forward here. It’s just random.

Why not write it so that they went into the storm because Jamie wasn’t on deck to tell them to avoid it? What if, like in the book, the Porpoise was actually pursuing them and that forced them into the storm? We could have lost the sex scene and done that instead. I still don’t understand why they cut the pursuit from the show. It feels like a mistake, even if I didn’t know how it worked in the book. There was very heavy-handed foreshadowing in the scene with LJG that never went anywhere—Chekhov’s gun that didn’t go off.

Basically, this episode is the culmination of all of their bad choices earlier in the season—and now not having enough time on this end to tell the story we need. They’re having to truncate everything, and the episode ends up just being a string of scenes that don’t feel totally connected.

The literal eye of the storm was a pretty visual, but I’m not getting the metaphor. What is the storm, exactly? Geillis and her prophecies?

Speaking of which, how does she manage to share that news? Did she send letters to like-minded people living in this time, and the word passes down 200 years until Brianna and Roger are living at Lallybroch? Or does someone else make a separate prophecy at some point?

The beach interlude was also baffling. It made more sense in the book to have Claire wake up in the house, and for their hosts to come and talk to them there. And at the end of the scene, the people just stroll away, no questions asked.

There also isn’t the sense of claiming their own identity again that we had in the books, since they’ve been using the name Fraser for most of the season, and certainly since arriving on Jamaica. That was always the big, dramatic bit for me, that pulled me through to the next book. Jamie has had to hide who he is for 20 years, even after Claire returned. But now he is in the New World, with a new start—and that allows him to regain his identity for the first time since Culloden. It’s a huge deal…and we didn’t get that sense at all.

All-in-all, I’m very disappointed with this season. The standout moments are the Jamie portions of the first few episodes, the much more nuanced and careful presentation of Yi Tien Cho, the lovely acting by David Berry, Fergus and Marsali’s relationship, and episode 312. Other than that…wow.

All I can say is that there is no Frank in Drums of Autumn (I don’t even remember any flashbacks, although it has been a while since I read it), and so maybe we will actually get a more balanced season four. One can hope.

Do you agree with my assessment of the season? I know several of you have been liking it, and that’s great! I really want to like it more, I swear. And I’m still hoping for the best as they move forward. There’s the potential for some truly epic stuff in the next book. *fingers crossed*

As usual, I will post a speculation page at some point during the hiatus to consider how to break Drums of Autumn into 13 episodes. But I doubt I’ll get that done until early 2018, as I still have to finish Secret Magic, the fourth book in my Fay of Skye series.

Despite my moaning and grumbling, I really do enjoy watching this show and writing this blog, and I enjoy getting comments from readers. So thanks for chiming in each week, and I can’t wait to see you all again for season four!

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Episode 313 – Eye of the Storm

  1. I enjoy your comments very much. I do look forward to more next season. I must say though, that I truly loved this last episode. The changes didn’t bother me. Done smoothly for the story. Loved LJG putting it too Captain L. Great! I did not think the sex was gratuitous. They seemed to have so little time together. I thought it was loving, tender and very sexy. I have always thought, in the books, those two were always going at it. Twenty years apart can do that. They want to eat each other up. I get it. Just sayin’….

    Thank you!!

    Like

    • I didn’t mind the changes that aligned with what they set up in the previous episode. But I’m not a big fan of stories where things just happen. I like the characters to push the story forward with their actions and choices. And the truth is, with the threat against Jamie neutralized by John, there’s no very good reason for them not to wait until storm season is over in the Atlantic and sail home to Scotland when it’s safe again. Even if they don’t want to stay on a British-controlled island, there are plenty of choices in the Caribbean to hang out until later. I just felt like things were missing from this episode. They didn’t necessarily need to fill in those pieces with stuff from the books, but I would have liked *something.* Especially when it felt so ominous for Captain Leonard to point out that he could take Jamie if he found him at sea–and then the Porpoise isn’t seen again.

      As for gratuitous–I don’t mean that it was excessive. There definitely has not been excessive sex this season! When I say gratuitous, I mean that it didn’t have a place in the story. And they could very easily have given it a place in the story. If, instead of sticking so closely to the books and taking the dialogue straight off the page, they’d changed it and made the sex be an extension of Jamie helping Claire recover from killing Geillis, that would have been perfect. And yeah, I totally understand why they would want to have sex often! But that doesn’t mean the sex has a place in the story they were telling in this episode. Stories aren’t just a simple recounting of one action after another. Writers need to pick the actions that have meaning. So while it’s lovely to see them have sex, and this would have been a nice scene in a different context, in this episode they shouldn’t have used it. Or, rather, they should have rewritten it. Because I absolutely think it’s important for us to see Jamie and Claire reconnecting this way. But that isn’t enough of a justification for the scene as written. In my opinion, anyway.

      Thank you for your comments, and I hope Droughtlander doesn’t last too long!

      Like

  2. I felt like a “bad person”, an outlander traitor until I read your comments. Eureka. .someone understood. I too believe the acting is superb, they are their characters.
    But the writing confused me. Especially the voodoo scene. I am 65 and I felt like I was watching a 50’s b movie. I was embarrassed. I have read all the books and scenes were explained..sometimes I disagreed but the chapters made sense.
    So thank you for your honesty and your insight. I dinna fash. .I was not alone in my opinions. Thank you!

    Like

    • I am so glad to hear that you felt the same way as me! I do love Outlander, and there are still some great things about the show. It’s always beautifully shot and designed, the music is fantastic, and the actors manage to do impeccable work even when they’re given questionable material. And of course we always have the books. But yeah, this season went off the rails a few times! I’m hoping without Frank to take up so much unnecessary space, next season will be a lot better. *fingers crossed* Thank you for your comment!

      Like

  3. “Eye of the Storm” metaphor was a total misfire for me. If you are in the eye of the storm on land, there’s a nice quiet moment, but that does not happen in the ocean. In fact, that’s the worst place to be! This is another place where the writers fell in love with an idea that didn’t spring from the novel (brain surgery in Creme de Menthe, anyone?) and there was no turning back (or Googling eye of hurricane in ocean). Voyager is a journey story at its heart, and trying to make something more of it is where the TV writers went off the rails. It’s about these characters finding their way through time and over the ocean. Where will they end up? That’s Voyager.

    Like

    • I agree. They need to commit to either taking their own direction with the story or being a little more faithful to the source material. I mean, I’m fine with adaptive changes. Any time you change mediums, there will be changes, and some of the ones the show has made have been brilliant. We got Rupert, right? But a lot of them have had nothing to do with keeping the spirit of the books (you can’t try to make a saint out of Frank and still have the story follow the same trajectory without vilifying Claire). Any change has consequences, but I don’t think they realized far off the rails their changes were taking them. This season was them having to deal with that and trying to bring them back in line with the books. I’m hoping that now we’re here they can jettison a lot of the baggage for season 4. But I guess we’ll see!

      Like

  4. Is anyone else having Outlander withdrawals already?? Season 3 just didn’t do it enough to sustain me till Season 4. It just didn’t satiate me like the first two seasons. Did anyone else feel that way??
    What are my Outlander sisters doing to sustain themselves till Season 4?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s