Season Three Premiere Date!


OK, so there isn’t an actual date yet, but we do know it will air in September.


Despite adding about five months to Droughtlander, this is actually a good thing. I feel that some of the problems with Season 2 could have been avoided if they’d had more time during the filming and early production process. So I’m crossing my fingers for some wise decisions to be made about the ship-going and island portion of the story.

Along with the September premiere date, Starz also released a summary of the season (basically the same as the one they already put out, but edited a little), which does not bode well:

The story picks up right after Claire (Caitriona Balfe) travels through the stones to return to her life in 1948. Now pregnant with Jamie’s (Sam Heughan) child, she struggles with the fallout of her sudden reappearance and its effect on her marriage to her first husband, Frank (Tobias Menzies). Meanwhile, in the 18th century, Jamie suffers from the aftermath of his doomed last stand at the historic battle of Culloden, as well as the loss of Claire. As the years pass, Jamie and Claire attempt to make a life apart from one another, each haunted by the memory of their lost love. The budding possibility that Claire can return to Jamie in the past breathes new hope into Claire’s heart… as well as new doubt. Separated by continents and centuries, Claire and Jamie must find their way back to each other. As always, adversity, mystery, and adventure await them on the path to reunion. And the question remains: When they find each other, will they be the same people who parted at the standing stones, all those years ago?

I realize that they’re trying to build up tension, but let’s face it. More than half (if not significantly more than that) of their viewers have read the books, either before the show ever aired, on in response to seeing the show. We all know that Jamie and Claire are going to get back together and Things Will Happen™. So the fact that they’re putting so much emphasis on the time apart makes me think that we’re looking at more than a few episodes of separation.

When I did my season three speculation episode breakdown, I figured on about three episodes before the print shop in Edinburgh. There’s an awful lot to cover during the years apart, particularly for Jamie. But I also wrote my breakdown assuming the series would pick up in 1968 with Bree, Roger, and Claire. Obviously we’re going to get there because we have Joe Abernathy cast, but that summary basically says that the season will start in 1948 and 1746 concurrently.

Sigh. More freaking Frank.

The only good thing I can think of is that, after he’s dead, we will never see him again except in the rare dream/flashback. Same with BJR. And we have at least one more season after this one to live in the blissful world post-Randalls.

Den of Geek has a very comprehensive post about the latest news here.

In other news, I have obviously not yet done my Voyager re-read. I’m a terrible blogger, I know. I’ve been having a rough winter here with illness, injury, accidents, and holidays keeping me away from my keyboard. Plus I have a rather busy writing schedule for my fantasy romance series and a day job. So this blog is on hiatus, barring any Outlander news, for the next few months at least. I’m hoping to come back for the re-read sometime in the summer, a few months before the show returns.

Until then, try to get through Droughtlander as best as you can!

2 thoughts on “Season Three Premiere Date!

  1. Ugh, nothing against Tobias Menzies, but I thought there was far too much Frank/BJR in S1 & S2. I am not looking forward to the character eating up even more air time in the 3rd season. Do they really need to keep bringing him back again and again at such length? I had not read the books before I saw the show. I never thought he was very sympathetic. Frank struck me as very controlling and a bit condescending to Claire in the show, only caring about what he wanted and his interests. They are on their honeymoon, have been apart for years, and all he can do is bury his nose in books? Really? He did not love her unconditionally. To me, it was very clear they were ill-suited to one another. When I read the books, I liked him even less.

    I really wish the seasons were 16 episodes again, so we could explore more of Voyager. But then we might get more Frank/BJR. I feel he’s gotten more airtime at the expense of the characters I really care about, Jamie & Claire.


    • I completely agree. There was some speculation early in the show’s run that Ron Moore identifies with Frank and that’s why we’re getting so much of him. I think he may have said something to that effect in an interview. But that’s really no excuse, and Outlander isn’t a love-triangle. Her marriage to Frank was ill-advised, and then they spent many years apart. And then she fell through time and fell truly and deeply in love. While I have absolutely no problem accepting that Claire is a loyal person and wants to be true to her vows when she returns to the 20th century, it’s pretty clear in the book that things got really bad between them, really fast. My worry is that the show has already tried to “rehabilitate” Frank and that’s going to undermine Claire and Jamie. Which would be the absolute wrong decision, since their love is the beating heart at the center of the story.

      I also agree about missing the longer season. Voyager is a huge book, and it’s going to be hard to condense into 13 episodes. When I did it for my breakdown, I had to cram a LOT of stuff into each one. The writers definitely have their work cut out for them!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s